Is the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is a good alternative to a traditional ice cream treat since it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is manufactured with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it as often as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, that was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we are exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Because of this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that individuals who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so when they only need to take with you the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have already been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert which allows you to put it into the mouth area, this means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you might go. If the product also offers an extinguisher it is also in violation of regulations. The reason being that since there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke a different one.
Because the maker of Puff Element Vape Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. In addition to sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco in to the marketplace.
In addition to the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes available could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially decrease the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not supply them with nicotine.
It seems that the UK government may have a point. There’s currently no requirement for tobacco companies to add warning labels on their products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have as a common factor is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem like a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which in turn implies that fewer people will purchase them.